Pacific Data Viz Challenge 2026
The Pacific can describe its rain
after the fact. It cannot
see it coming.
In 2015 a severe drought hit Papua New Guinea's highlands, but the country lacked the observations needed to see its local impact coming. Forecasting rain depends on layers of observation, and across the Pacific those layers are thinning. The upper-air network that provides early warning is almost gone. As rainfall patterns become more variable, we are losing the ability to see those changes as they arrive.
1 · The cost
When the drought came, we couldn't see it
In 2015, El Niño brought severe drought to Papua New Guinea's highlands, where the rainfall observations needed to see its local impact were largely missing.
The rain began falling away in April 2015. Between mid-July and mid-August, at the one high-altitude research station recording it, temperatures fell to minus two degrees before dawn. The frosts destroyed sweet potato, the staple crop, in gardens above 2,200 metres, where a replanted crop takes eight to twelve months to mature.
The ocean was watched. By early April 2015, forecasters including the Australian Bureau of Meteorology were reporting a severe El Niño moving west. What no one could say was how much rain would fall in the Kandep basin, or when it would stop.
The highlands are where most of Papua New Guinea's people live, between roughly 1,500 and 2,800 metres. They are also where almost none of the measurement is.
2 · Seeing rain
What it takes to see rain coming
Forecasting rainfall depends on observations at three levels: balloons in the atmosphere, buoys at sea, and gauges on the ground.
Rainfall is not one measurement. It takes three: the ocean below, the ground itself, and the air above. Each does a different job. Scroll to see what each one contributes, and what the forecast loses without it.
It fuels the rain
Moored buoys along the equator, ships on the shipping lanes, drifters in between. They show where the warm water and the moisture sit, weeks to seasons ahead. This is the layer the El Niño forecast is built on.
— platforms reported in the tropical Pacific in July 2026, and — sat within 1 hPa of the model, against — globally.
It records what arrived
Rain gauges measure what actually fell. They are what every satellite estimate is calibrated against, and what any local forecast has to be built from. You cannot say what an El Niño means for a district without decades of rainfall measured in that district.
Papua New Guinea's highest gauge sits at — metres, in a country with peaks above 4,000.
It steers the rain
Radiosondes rise twice a day and read temperature, humidity and wind through the whole depth of the atmosphere. That is what tells a forecaster where the convection is going over the next few days. That is the difference between knowing an El Niño is running and knowing which valley gets the rain.
Across the Pacific there were — sounding sites at the 1979 peak. There are — now.
The ocean layer works, but on its own it is not enough
The ground layer is the one that has to answer the farmer's question, and it is the one asked to cover the most water. Rainfall varies over kilometres, and a gauge only ever speaks for the ground around it. So what matters is not how many gauges a country has. It is how much of the country is close to one.
gauge-coverage.R.3 · The gap
Counted, but not reporting
Across the Pacific, stations exist on paper but many are silent, while the upper-air network has almost disappeared.
A station in the register is not a station sending data. WMO monitors both, and the gap between them is where the network quietly stopped. Under GBON a station counts as compliant when it delivered 80% of required reports on at least 80% of days in the month.
The highland stations do exist. They are simply not switched on.
Count the stations instead of listening to them, and the region looks adequately covered. Against the international standard most of it is, which says more about the standard than about the network.
The layer that steers the forecast has gone
— never had one at all.
Who pays decides which layer works
Papua New Guinea is registered for upper-air observation and received — of — expected soundings in July 2026. Solomon Islands and Tuvalu are also registered, and also sent nothing. The obligation does not go beyond the books. The balloons are not going up.
The two layers also come apart inside the same country, which points at what is actually driving it.
This is also what makes the gap easy to miss. Every silent station is still counted: in the register, in the network totals, and in any assessment built on how many stations a country has. On paper the region is better observed than it was thirty years ago.
The same logic decides what is watched. Tide gauges and rain gauges belong to different programmes, on different funding cycles, answering to different agencies.
SEA_LVL and
METEO_MONITOR_NET. SEA_LVL is satellite altimetry: annual anomaly in
metres, 1993 to 2023, complete for all 21 countries and territories, which is why the left
column is the same on every row. The station series is annual and the earliest of them begins
in 1889. Four more sea level countries (Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Wallis
and Futuna) are absent from the station indicator.4 · Going blind
Bigger swings, fewer eyes
As rainfall patterns become more extreme and uncertain, the observation network needed to anticipate them is shrinking.
Historically, ships logged sea temperature on their way to somewhere else, and satellites later read the same surface from orbit. Both cover the Pacific because the Pacific is in the way, and neither was built to watch these islands. A line drawn back to 1850 is not the same thing as a country measuring its own weather, and a record built for one purpose cannot answer what is being asked of it now: the regional warming rate roughly tripled in the mid-1980s, and it is rainfall, not temperature, that has to be planned around.
SST_ANOM, 21 countries and territories.SST_ANOM. Anomaly in °C.That is the part we can measure. The same ships and satellites have read the same patch of ocean for 175 years, so the warming shows up clearly, and it is the number every summary of the Pacific reports. But rain is the part people plan around, and it is the part nobody could see coming.
Temperature is the thing the long record measures well, and it is the one every summary of the Pacific reports. Rainfall is the thing people plan around, and it behaves differently. It does not climb. It lurches, and it lurches far harder than the trend ever moves.
Rainfall anomalies 1985–2025, the same window as the temperature trend. Trends are taken country by country and sized without regard to direction, so a wetting country and a drying one cannot cancel each other out.
RAIN_ANOM, 22 countries and territories.The temperature trend was only measurable because the same places were measured the same way for decades. Rainfall asks for more than that: it moves faster and over shorter distances, so seeing it takes more instruments in more places. It is also the thing the region has fewest instruments for.
The swings are not random, which is what makes them forecastable in principle. In an El Niño, warm water slides east and the rain follows it, so one half of the Pacific is wet while the other is dry.
The South Pacific Convergence Zone shifts north-east toward the equator and loses its diagonal shape, so the convection migrates. Islands near the equator gain rain. Islands to the south-west lose it.
You cannot prepare for what you cannot watch arriving. The next El Niño will be forecast from the ocean, accurately, months ahead. Nobody will be able to say what it means for a valley in Enga.